Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Neurol Sci ; 42(5): 1653-1659, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1056019

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To explore the activity changes in neurology clinical practice that have occurred in tertiary public hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Outpatient and inpatient data from the neurology department were extracted from the electronic medical record system of three tertiary Grade A hospitals in Wenzhou. Data were analyzed across 5 months following the beginning of the pandemic (from January 13 to May 17) and compared with the same period in 2019. Data on reperfusion therapy for acute infarction stroke were extracted monthly from January to April. RESULTS: The number of outpatients declined from 102,300 in 2019 to 75,154 in 2020 (26.54%), while the number of inpatients in the three tertiary Grade A hospitals decreased from 4641 to 3437 (25.94%). The latter trend showed a significant drop from the 3rd week to the 7th week. The number of patients in these hospitals decreased significantly, and a significant drop was seen in the neurology department. As usual, stroke was the most common disease observed; however, anxiety/depression and insomnia increased dramatically in the outpatient consultation department. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study revealed the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic in the clinical practice of neurology in Wenzhou during the outbreak. Understanding the pandemic's trends and impact on neurological patients and health systems will allow for better preparation of neurologists in the future.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Neurology , Humans , Neurologists , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
2.
Neurologia (Engl Ed) ; 35(4): 252-257, 2020 May.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-700407

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic will give rise to long-term changes in neurological care, which are not easily predictable. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A key informant survey was used to enquire about the changes expected in the specialty over the next 5 years. The survey was completed by heads of neurology departments with broad knowledge of the situation, having been active during the pandemic. RESULTS: Despite a low level of consensus between participants, there was strong (85%) and moderate consensus (70%) about certain subjects, mainly the increase in precautions to be taken, the use of telemedicine and teleconsultations, the reduction of care provided in in-person consultations to avoid the presence of large numbers of people in waiting rooms, the development of remote training solutions, and the changes in monitoring visits during clinical trials. There was consensus that there would be no changes to the indication of complementary testing or neurological examination. CONCLUSION: The key informant survey identified the foreseeable changes in neurological care after the pandemic.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections , Health Care Surveys , Nervous System Diseases/therapy , Neurology/trends , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Administrative Personnel/psychology , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Testing , Clinical Laboratory Techniques , Clinical Trials as Topic/methods , Consensus , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Disease Management , Distance Counseling , Forecasting , Hospital Departments/organization & administration , Humans , Nervous System Diseases/diagnosis , Neurologic Examination , Neurology/methods , Neurology/organization & administration , Pandemics/prevention & control , Patient Isolation , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Spain/epidemiology
3.
Neurologia (Engl Ed) ; 35(4): 233-237, 2020 May.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-47011

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 epidemic has led to the need for unprecedented decisions to be made to maintain the provision of neurological care. This article addresses operational decision-making during the epidemic. DEVELOPMENT: We report the measures taken, including the preparation of a functional reorganisation plan, strategies for hospitalisation and emergency management, the use of telephone consultations to maintain neurological care, provision of care at a unit outside the hospital for priority patients, decisions about complementary testing and periodic in-hospital treatments, and the use of a specific telephone service to prioritise patients with epileptic seizures. CONCLUSION: Despite the situation of confinement, neurology departments must continue to provide patient care through different means of operation. Like all elements of management, these must be evaluated.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections , Nervous System Diseases/therapy , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Decision Making , Disease Management , Emergency Medical Services/organization & administration , Health Priorities , Home Care Services/organization & administration , Hospital Departments/organization & administration , Hospitalization , Humans , Nervous System Diseases/diagnosis , Neurology/organization & administration , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/organization & administration , Pandemics/prevention & control , Patient Isolation , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Risk Assessment , Telemedicine/organization & administration
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL